Questions
In your own broking account, in your own name, the entire time. We never hold it, never receive it, and cannot withdraw it. If we disappeared overnight your money would be exactly where it was.
No. The access we hold permits placing and managing orders. It does not permit fund transfers or withdrawals.
No. You log in on your broker's own page and we receive a token you can revoke. We also do not collect your two-factor seed by default — that is optional, off unless you ask for it, and we would rather not hold it at all.
Revoke our access from your broker. It takes a minute, needs no cooperation from us, and immediately stops any further orders. Your holdings stay yours.
₹999 once to set up, then ₹199 a month. Taxes extra where applicable.
No. Not 10%, not any percentage. If it makes you money that is entirely yours. Equally, if it loses, that is yours — we carry no liability for trading losses.
Two reasons. It would put us on the wrong side of how such arrangements are regulated in India, and it would give us an incentive to want more risk in your account than you might. A flat fee keeps our interest aligned with the software working, not with it gambling.
NSE cash equities on a volume-breakout and momentum screen, with hard stop-losses, a target and a time limit on every position. It can also park idle cash in a liquid ETF. You choose which segments to enable and how much to allocate.
No — it runs on our server, not your computer. Your machine can be off.
Your own dashboard shows positions, cash, P&L and a decision log explaining each action. You get a daily report, and alerts when something needs you.
Yes. Pause stops new entries while continuing to manage existing stops. Stop halts everything. Both are one click on your dashboard.
Potentially everything you allocate. Stop-losses limit the size of a typical losing trade, but they are instructions to sell, not price guarantees — in a gap or a fast market a fill can be much worse. Please read the risk disclosure properly.
We don't promise any, and we would be suspicious of anyone who did. Watch it in paper mode and form your own view.
Those positions are unmanaged until it is back — stops will not be enforced by us. We alert you on every channel you've given us so you can act in your broker terminal. This is a real risk, not a theoretical one, and it is why you should stay able to intervene.
It picks at most one candidate per scan from a shortlist that deterministic rules have already filtered, and it can decline. It cannot change your risk limits, your position size, your stops, or your capital caps — those are set outside it and it never sees a path to them. There is also a forecasting model whose measured accuracy we track and publish to ourselves; it is currently a weak signal and is treated as one.
A full walkthrough is on how the engine works. The short answers:
Stocks that have broken out on unusually heavy volume for the time of day, are up but not already exhausted, are liquid enough to exit cheaply, and are priced where a sensible position can be sized. Then context — relative strength against the index, the ten-day trend, its own volatility, whether buyers are holding it above the day's average price.
Backwards from the stop, which is the important part. The stop is placed first, derived from the stock's own daily range, then the quantity is whatever makes the distance to that stop equal a fixed slice of your capital. So a violent stock gets a smaller position and the rupee risk per trade stays roughly constant.
It picks one name from a shortlist that arithmetic has already filtered, or it declines. It cannot set your stop, change your position size, raise a capital cap, override a concentration limit, or name a stock that wasn't on the list. Those are computed outside it. If it's unavailable or over budget, the result is no trade — never a fallback entry.
Publishing a live system's precise trigger points invites people to trade against them. The method is on the engine page in full and most of it is textbook — the parameters are withheld, not the approach. If anyone tells you their edge is a clever formula, be sceptical.
Behavioural, and modest. Volume-breakout momentum is widely known and works in some regimes and not others — there's no information advantage here. What a program does better than a person is not widen a stop because the trade is going badly, not size by feel, cut the loser on schedule, and not get brave after a winning week. That's a small claim, deliberately, because it's one you can check.
Neither, in the equity strategy. Delivery only, long or flat.
Nothing different — that's the point. It doesn't size up to recover. There's a daily loss limit that stops it entirely, and a cooldown that prevents re-entering a name that just stopped you out.
It compares its book against the broker's every few minutes, and a second, independently written program queries the broker separately so the two can be checked against each other. That exists because of a real bug: the desk once invented a holding that didn't exist and it survived for days, because there was only one implementation of "what does the broker hold" and everything read the same wrong answer.
Currently yes — that's the broker the software integrates with. It's free to open. We'll walk you through it.
Enough for the strategy to size a position sensibly — we'll be honest with you about whether your intended amount is workable rather than taking the fee regardless.
As long as you want. There is no pressure to go live and we don't earn more when you do. We'd rather you saw it have a bad week first.
One person, running the same software on his own account with his own money, which is where it has been running for months. This is offered to friends and family, not sold at scale.
Something not answered here? Ask directly.